Show summary Hide summary
Ticketmaster quietly raised hidden fees after the FTC crackdown on junk charges. Documents reveal the company increased different charges at 26 venues to offset lost revenue. This deceptive strategy reveals the limits of fee transparency rules when facing dominant players.
🔥 Quick Facts
- Documents Obtained: Guardian obtained contracts from 26 publicly owned venues showing fee increases
- Strategy: Ticketmaster eliminated order processing fees but raised service fees to compensate
- Revenue Impact: Ticketmaster earned about 3 billion dollars in fees on 346 million tickets globally
- Venue Example: Findlay Toyota Center in Arizona dropped 6-dollar order fee but saw 2-dollar per-ticket increase
How Ticketmaster Sidestepped the FTC Rule
Following federal regulations banning surprise fees at checkout, Ticketmaster stopped charging order processing fees to comply with the all-in pricing rule. But internal documents reveal the company had no intention of accepting lost revenue. In emails to venues, Ticketmaster explicitly stated it must raise other fees to offset losses from the regulatory change.
The Findlay Toyota Center agreement is a perfect example. The venue eliminated its 6-dollar order processing fee, then Ticketmaster raised the per-ticket service charge by 2 dollars instead. The company wrote: “To account for the loss of order processing revenue, we must adjust fees to offset the revenue loss.” This perfectly legal workaround frustrated consumer advocates and former regulators.
Ticketmaster quietly raised hidden fees after FTC crackdown, documents reveal
Josh Allen confirms he’ll attend Bills’ spring workouts next week
The All-In Pricing Crackdown Timeline
President Biden launched a junk fees initiative in October 2022, making ticket service charges a key campaign message. In June 2023, Live Nation Entertainment publicly committed to all-in pricing at a White House roundtable, earning Biden’s praise as a consumer victory. The company portrayed itself as a willing partner in fee transparency.
By July 2024, California implemented a law banning hidden mandatory charges. Ticketmaster responded by raising fees at multiple California venues. The city of Sacramento saw Ticketmaster’s per-ticket cut increase by 25 percent, from 3.45 dollars to 4.25 dollars. The city of Cerritos received an identical fee increase letter.
Cross-Country Fee Shifts and Legal Questions
| Venue and Location | Fee Change Details |
| Findlay Toyota Center (Arizona) | Dropped 6-dollar fee, raised service charge by 2 dollars |
| Wintrust Arena (Chicago) | Raised ticket fees by 2.3 percent |
| Florida State University | Raised ticket fees by 3 percent |
| Rose Bowl (Pasadena) | Part of contracts reviewed in investigation |
John Newman, a former FTC economist, reviewed Ticketmaster’s memos and called them “potentially concerning.” He warned that disguising a banned fee as another charge could violate FTC rules against misrepresenting fees. Serena Viswanathan, a former FTC attorney, stated the regulation intended to eliminate this exact type of obscurity: “It really shows that all of these fees are kind of made up.”
“Since we remain largely hostage to Ticketmaster, they have simply shifted which hand they have in our pockets.”
— John Kwoka, Northeastern University Economics Professor
The Monopoly Problem Behind Fee Manipulation
The core issue is that Ticketmaster controls nearly 80 percent of US venues through exclusive ticketing contracts. Consumers cannot simply switch to a competitor with lower fees. If a fan wants tickets to a show at a Ticketmaster venue, they have no alternative but to accept whatever fees the platform charges.
John Kwoka, Northeastern University economist, told the Guardian that transparency laws have fundamental limits against dominant players. “In a competitive market, consumers might choose a ticketing provider with lower fees,” he explained. But with Ticketmaster’s near-monopoly control, this choice is almost never available to concert-goers.
Can the FTC Actually Stop This Practice?
Only the Federal Trade Commission has authority to determine whether Ticketmaster complies with its own all-in pricing rule. The agency separately filed a lawsuit in September 2025 alleging that Ticketmaster deceived consumers by hiding mandatory fees until the final checkout screen.
Live Nation Entertainment disputed the allegations, pointing to its compliance with the FTC regulation. However, the discovered documents suggest the company may have simply shifted from one prohibited practice to another. An FTC spokesperson declined to comment on individual company practices, leaving the question of enforcement unclear for now.
