Real Bad Hollywood: How Western film demonizes Arabs and Muslims

By Tim McSorley, March 9, 2007 Comments (10)

Reel Bad Arabs: Aladdin gets Racist

Aladdin. Back to the Future. True Lies. It isn’t everyday that you hear these three movies mentioned in the same breath, but for Dr. Jack Shaheen the link is clear. For thirty years, Shaheen, professor emeritus of mass communication at Southern Illinois University, has been studying the misrepresentation of Arabs and Muslims in film, particularly movies coming out of Hollywood. His conclusion: that Arabs and Muslims are the single most maligned and attacked group in the history of film. “If the case went before a jury, they’ll be out for 30 seconds and they will agree,” he says over the phone from his home in Illinois. Over the next few months, viewers can be will be the jury themselves as Shaheen tours North America with Reel Bad Arabs, the 2006 documentary based on his 2001 book of the same name.

While it’s a pretty sweeping judgment to make – there are plenty of racial, religious or political groups that would argue they’ve been consistently misrepresented by Hollywood – Shaheen backs up his claims with plenty of proof. Reel Bad Arabs, both film and book, are the result of nearly 20 years work, during which Shaheen viewed and analysed 950 films. Of those, only 5 percent showed Arabs of Muslims in a positive – or at least benign – light. “No one group has ever been, one, vilified in that many films, and two, vilified for more than a century,” he explains.

The Media Education Foundation documentary, which premiered last November to a sold out audience at the Dubai International Film Festival, features the affable Shaheen presenting his findings between clips of everything from Hollywood blockbusters like Rules of Engagement to little known b-movies like Hell Squad (where Las Vegas show girls are trained as commandos to stop nuclear bomb wielding Arabs).

This formula for a film – talking head plus clips – could be boring, but the presence of extracts from popular films, an intriguing topic, and the personable Shaheen himself make the film an easy watch. Most people will catch themselves re-thinking films they grew up loving, and questioning just how easy it is to buy into Hollywood’s story-telling and ignore the underlying racism. Even Shaheen admits that one of his favourite movies, the brilliant 1970 Network, falls prey to using the “Arab bogeyman.”

Neither is the documentary devoid of political relevance. Shaheen admirably shows how US foreign policy and Hollywood are often mutually reinforcing: policy influences media, media influences policy-makers. “We were killing Arabs on the silver screen for decades, so when all of a sudden we decide to go into Iraq, we were used to it – and it certainly didn’t hurt to have this history of stereotypes behind us,” says Shaheen. “In a sense all these films, intentionally or unintentionally, serve as propaganda against all things Arab and Islam.”

But through all this, Shaheen is hopeful. In his new book, Guilty? Hollywood’s Verdict of Arabs after 9/11, due out this summer, Shaheen looks at about 100 more films, half having been produced since 9/11, and sees a stark improvement from his previous work. About 30 percent, including such recent hits as Syriana and Babel, were at least favorable to Arabs and Muslims. While television – with popular shows such as 24 and Sleeper Cell invariably depicting ‘home-grown terrorists’ lurking around every corner – is lagging far behind film, Shaheen sees a general improvement overall

“I’m optimistic primarily for one reason, and that is that the industry and Americans per se, all of us per se, have a tendency to shed our prejudices against other people. And that’s history, I’m basing my optimism on history.”

Tim McSorley is a member of the editorial collective of Montreal based Siafu Magazine. A shorter version of this article appeared in the magazine’s March/April issue.

I would just like to mention that the Protagonist of Aladdin is also Arab. . .

Aladdin was also an Arab. As was Jasmin. I do not feel Aladdin was that much of an attack on Muslims or Arabs.

However, in regards to 9/11 and Islam's violent or peaceful nature.... Just read the Hadith. It is - in many cases - extremely violent. As are many other accounts of Muslim acts. I say, if they are victims, why does history show they act like villains since Mohammed decided to pick up the sword?
I do not wish to villify Muslims. But history shows what history shows. And History is not politically correct. It is, however, most revealing.

"'No one group has ever been, one, vilified in that many films, and two, vilified for more than a century,' he explains."

Let's also not forget the thousands of movies in which Caucasians have been the enemy. And blacks, Mexicans, Europeans, etc.

The mullahs and clerics of Islam mostly forbid watching of "western" entertainment. Watching all of those movies should be good for a couple hundred lashes. You have a culture/religion that dishes out public beatings to women for being a rape victim. Then you howl because of how Hollywood portrays said culture/religion. I guess that those brave terrorists cutting heads off of anyone that doesn't agree with them are just misunderstood.

ak075840587

You also are incorrect buddy! Aladdin was not an Arab. The culture shown in the movie (Dancing, clothes, buildings, snake charmers) was clearly of South Asian origin.

Now onto your Hadith "argument". If you had bothered to Google, you would find that Google gives you the dictionary definition which is: "Sayings and practices of Mohammed. They were collected after his death."
This makes two important points.
1. Mohammed (PBUH) never claimed to be a divine being, making his sayings and practices neither holy nor a direct basis for what God's word was. This makes the "violent" hadith that you seem to an authority in very unimportant. The only guidelines given by God were the Qu'ran.
2. They were collected after his death. Much as the New Testament was collected and compiled years after Jesus' (PBUH) "death", the Hadith were compiled from what his companions remembered and/or interpreted of his actions and words.

And lastly, Mohammed chose to pick up the sword to because the city that he had just migrated to was being going to be held siege by the people of the city had just moved from. For more background, which it seems like you desperately need, watch the Message, directed by Moustapha Akkad, the producer of Halloween. Enjoy!

And I guess the inquisition and crusades are not part of history.

I love your post. Very wise :)

Thank you very much. I was really becoming disheartened by people's arrogance. It just goes to show how deep some prejudices run. I really appreciate your wisdom, as well. Hopefully people will be able to take something from it.

Correction: Aladdin in Disney's Aladdin is Southeast Asian (possibly Malaysian?). The same with Jasmine. She looks like she has some Thai in her.

Arab people don't look like those characters.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote> <embed> <param> <object> <center> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Advertise with us

What is Art Threat?

Art Threat is a blog about art and politics. We write about political art of all genres, and discuss public policy as it pertains to culture. Read more.

Subscribe & Share

Subscribe to our RSS feed

Add our Facebook App

Stalk us on Twitter

Sign up for our newsletter


Masthead

Editor: Rob Maguire

Contributing Editors: Michael Lithgow, Ezra Winton

Writers: Leslie Dreyer, Mél Hogan, Anikka Maya Weerasinghe

Sponsored links